Hawaii vs. Office of Hawaiian Affairs

Travel Blog  •  Pam Mandel  •  02.24.09 | 12:48 PM ET

Photo by k*8 via Flickr (Creative Commons).

A brief disclaimer: I’m not an expert on legal matters and while I’ve been doing lots of reading, there’s still lots I don’t understand. Because of that, I absolutely welcome your more enlightened comments on the case. I’d just like to get you interested in what’s happening and why it’s a big deal, I’m going to keep it brief and send you elsewhere to more expert commentary. Now, in summary:

The Hawaiian State Supreme Court previously ruled that the state (Hawaii) could not sell lands ceded in the overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy until a settlement on those lands had been reached with the Hawaiian people. The gist? The lands were ceded to the U.S. government by those who had no right to do so.

The state of Hawaii is appealing the decision—it wants the right to sell those lands. It says that its ability to manage the lands is impeded by this ruling. That’s the bare bones of the case. But Native Hawaiians see a lot more at stake in the Supreme Court’s first case tomorrow.

There’s a critical sidebar here—Native Hawaiians have received no federal recognition in the way that many Native American and Alaskan people have. They’re depending on state law for their entitlements. The 1999 Apology Resolution acknowledged the impact of the overthrow of the Kingdom, but did not resolve land claims.

Because of that, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs is concerned about three things when the case comes before the court.

There’s more, of course, that’s just the entry point. For more detailed information check out these sources: