Paris: ‘A Delicate Pale Blue’ No Longer?

Travel Blog  •  Eva Holland  •  02.12.08 | 11:11 AM ET


Photo by kla4067 via Flickr, (Creative Commons).

Plenty of cities have imposed smoking bans in bars and restaurants by now, but it’s rare that they chip away at a world-renowned image in the process. In Paris, on the other hand, where the city’s identity seems more intimately connected with smoking, the ban that came into force Jan. 1 has the potential to alter more than just the air quality.

So I was interested to read Andrew Martin’s excellent story in The Guardian about his first smoke-free visit to the City of Lights.

Martin writes:

I always imagine Paris as a delicate pale blue: the colour of the world inhabited by Alain Delon in the thriller Le Samourai; the colour of Gaulois and Gitanes. The late Art Buchwald, Paris correspondent of the Washington Post, called it “The City of Lighters” and, contemplating a smoking ban, he wrote: “Can you imagine the hookers of Pigalle standing in doorways and biting their nails?”

No, neither can I.

 


Eva Holland is co-editor of World Hum. She is a former associate editor at Up Here and Up Here Business magazines, and a contributor to Vela. She's based in Canada's Yukon territory.


7 Comments for Paris: ‘A Delicate Pale Blue’ No Longer?

John M. Edwards 02.12.08 | 6:21 PM ET

Hi Eva:

I, too, regard Paris as being a city of delicate pale blue. In fact I just chucked the French art film “Betty Blue” into my Amazon cart.

I doubt, though, that Parisians will honor a silly and spurious law like “No Smoking.” I’m sure that a Gaulloise-puffing cafe habitué, used to listening to Serge Gainsbourg, would regard the hysterical tirades of American Dristan victims as morally reprehensible.

The anti-smoking crusade clearly began in the United States. It is indeed the most ridiculous and dangerous law ever passed. Not only does it violate our basic human rights, it’s downright invasive. I doubt anybody would be thrilled to be found in flagrante in their own apartment, waving an unlicensed Cubana, before being slamdunked with a fine and a short period sniffing like a bloodhound between the bars.

Unfortunately, the nervous nellies who complained about spurious “second-hand smoke” in restaurants and bars, think nothing of ruining our glorious space-age metropolises with their opinions. I’m afraid, air pollution is worse than smoking. Good luck going to Mexico City if a pack of Winston’s makes you grow green in the face.

Boy oh boy, everyone just loves sitting nervously in airports during a twelve-hour layover, without being able to hang out in the bar, punctuating their draft beers with the occasional cigarette. Uh, they kind of sell Marlboros, Dunhills, and 555s in the duty free shops. Remember, if you are caught smoking in the bathroom, drop it in quickly, flush it down, and lie through your teeth, “I guarantee it wasn’t me, it was the guy before me.”

Some people do indeed go back and forth through Customs to choke down one last cigarette before their nightmare longhaul flight on Quantus. Come on, flying used to be fun. We filled our ashtrays, stole extra aiplane bottles, and wondered about the Mile High Club.

The only reason all those airlines folded like the dotcoms, is, we’re not going to have a nervous breakdown just because you legislate it. Yeah right, It’s every traveler’s wet dream to take a 24-hour bus tour through, say, the Malay peninsula, sort of hemming and hawing and counting sheep. And yes, if you make a big deal about it, the bus will at least stop so you can have a smoke, buy even more cartons, and say, “Can’t wait to get to that beach resort.”

I’m sorry, there is no real evidence that smoking is that bad for you—in moderation. Eating too much food makes you fat. Drinking too much makes you drunk. Walking too much makes you lame. It reallyh should be up to the establisment. What are they going to ban next? “No talking in public!”

TambourineMan 02.12.08 | 11:21 PM ET

Amen.

Ann Robinson 02.14.08 | 10:34 AM ET

There is no evidence that smoking is bad fo you!!  You must be an executive from one of the tobacco companies.  Science has beyond proven that smoking, as well as second hand smoke is harmfull.  Just ask all the people with lung cancer and emphasema.  Smokers are only concerned with feeding their own addiction and not the discomfort and health of others around them, even children. Moderation is something a smoker does not comprehend so don’t even go there.

Smoking Facts 04.23.08 | 2:27 AM ET

Whoever thinks smoking doesn’t harm you must have some stake in the tobacco companies.  Here are some cold hard facts:

Cigarette smoking has been identified as the most important source of preventable morbidity and premature mortality in the United States and the world.

Smoking-related diseases cause an estimated 440,000 American deaths each year.

Smoking costs the United States over $150 billion annually in health care costs.

A 2004 Study by the CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion found that cigarette smoke contains over 4,800 chemicals, 69 of which are known to cause cancer.

cindy 06.18.08 | 12:32 AM ET

I am thrill that there is no smoking in France that I will be going there this oct. Now if we can just conqueurt the world with our non-smoking ways

Michelle 10.24.08 | 11:26 PM ET

Conquer the world with your non-smoking ways????  That will never happen.

Understandably it is a health risk to the person smoking.  Non-smoking restaurants and no smoking in hospitals is a wonderful idea!!  However, to DISCRIMINATE against people for doing what they enjoy is ludicris!  It is THEIR BODY ... if they wish to smoke, OUTSIDE, and ruin their own body, then that is their own choice not the choice of anyone else.  Just remember ... people will smoke regardless ... just as people do drugs regardless of the risks and laws involved.

Pat 11.12.08 | 7:47 PM ET

in response to TambourineMan your right it is bad for you and so is second hand smoke, however to say that all smokers are concerned with is “feeding their addiction” is going a bit to far not all smokers are alike. I personally will smoke in my car if I have that option if not I will try to find either a place that is just smokers around or a place that is at least 30 ft. from everyone else. Also as you said feeding their addiction, for some people (myself being one of them) it is very hard to quit smoking and all the crap they see doesn’t work for some (like me) so it isn’t that smokers are only concerned with feeding their addiction for us it feels like the addiction is a rabid animal saying if you don’t go have a cig now I might just rip your head off. Smokers are people to so drop the holier than thou act unless you have experience in the matter.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.