Should Airlines Change the ‘Lap Child’ Policy?

Travel Blog  •  Eva Holland  •  10.09.09 | 1:35 PM ET

Beth Blair of The Vacation Gals thinks so. Her call for a ban is pretty convincing.


Eva Holland is the senior editor of World Hum. Her writing has also appeared in the National Post, the Montreal Gazette, the Ottawa Citizen and WestJet's Up! Magazine, among other publications. She's based in Ottawa, Canada.


4 Comments for Should Airlines Change the ‘Lap Child’ Policy?

Sara 10.09.09 | 3:44 PM ET

I agree with Beth.

Love2SeeNewThings 10.09.09 | 7:04 PM ET

When I saw the title of this piece, I was completely confused.  I thought to myself:  “What the hell is a lap child…don’t tell me some kid actually rides in his/her mother or father’s lap during the whole flight!”  Well, after reading the article the answer is yes.  So, here is my new question:

If the plane crashes, the child dies and so does other passengers because the child literally becomes a loose canon ball - who gets sued first?  The FAA for not banning the practise.  The airline for allowing the practise.  And/or the recently grieving parent that held the child.

Or - let me guess…no lawsuit at all because someone somewhere will think it is too barbaric to sue and set precedent to avoid future catastrophes.

Grizzly Bear Mom 10.10.09 | 11:41 AM ET

If parents were chiefly concerned with their children’s safety they would purchase a seat for the child regardless of the cost.  If you are too poor to fly safely, don’t.

Alexandra 10.11.09 | 4:08 PM ET

The age limit is under 2 and the child is in a harness that is hooked on to the adult traveling seat belt.  Its safe - not especially comfortable.

Add a Comment

NOTE: We reserve the right to remove comments with profanity, personal attacks, spam, overt advertisements or other inappropriate material.

View our Privacy Policy »* = Required

Personal Information
*
Contact Information
*
Comments
Electives