Travel Writing: Not Exactly a Racket

Tom Swick: Contemplating and celebrating the world of travel

04.03.09 | 4:36 PM ET

Iveta Benesova at the Sony Ericsson OpenIveta Benesova at the Sony Ericsson Open. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

In cities, back streets hold surprises you don’t find on the boulevards; similarly at a tennis tournament, the outer courts are often more illuminating than the stadium.

There are fewer fans, so you get a closer look, a greater appreciation for the nearly unanswerable velocity of the ball (which not even high definition television can capture) and the lightning reflexes of little-known players.

You are also given a widespread view of the sport’s global embrace. Taking the courts at the Sony Ericsson on the first Saturday of the tournament were players from Estonia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Hungary, Serbia, Croatia, Slovakia, Romania (doesn’t Bulgaria want to join the party?), Scotland, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands (Belgium, after dominating the women’s game for a few years, is distinguished by its absence), Chile, Argentina, Israel, India, South Africa, China, Japan, Thailand, Australia, Canada and of course the United States. For at least a week every year, Key Biscayne is the most international small island in the world.

The outer courts are used not just for matches but for practice sessions, which offer up their own revelations. The main one—which comes to you as you watch an unsmiling Slav pound forehand after forehand—is that being a tennis player is not nearly as glamorous as it’s made out to be. In fact, after a few minutes observing Novak Djokovic in the midday heat, I decided that being a tennis player is in many ways like being a travel writer.

We both do for a living what the rest of the population does in its free time. Our work is other people’s idea of fun. The world takes in its stride that we live a charmed life.

We both travel widely, and rarely to hell holes. We end up in places people go for vacation: great cities—Rome, Paris, London, Melbourne—and warm climates: Florida, California, the French Riviera. Palm trees feature prominently in many of our backdrops, nicely feeding the illusion that we’ve got it made.

We both have followers: fans and readers, though the latter tend not to paint their faces in national colors. And we both have instructors: coaches and editors, both of whom think they know more than we do. It pleases us to remember that without us they’d be jobless.

Since most people watch the matches on TV (read our stories on the couch), they have no idea of the work that went into them. They can’t imagine all the hours of preparation (research), drills (legwork), first serves and second serves (writing and rewriting). Some delude themselves into thinking that they could give us competition, but all you have to do is watch a weekend hacker, or read a banal postcard, to see the huge gap between the pro and the amateur. It is a testament to our skills that we both make it look easy.

Yet most of us never reach a major final (the bestseller list). We are journeymen and journeywomen, toiling in semi-obscurity and dreaming of one day becoming a Sampras (Theroux) or Agassi (Bryson) or Serena Williams (Elizabeth Gilbert). Many of us possess the whole arsenal: the 130 mph serve (killer lead), the topspin backhand (felicitous turn of phrase), the drop shot (pun). We know we could become famous, we could break through to the top, if only we could cut down on our unforced errors (clichés).


Tom Swick

Tom Swick is the author of two books: a travel memoir, Unquiet Days: At Home in Poland, and a collection of travel stories, A Way to See the World: From Texas to Transylvania with a Maverick Traveler. He was the travel editor of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel for 19 years, and his work has been included in "The Best American Travel Writing" 2001, 2002, 2004 and 2008.


8 Comments for Travel Writing: Not Exactly a Racket

Patrick Powers 04.03.09 | 11:19 PM ET

This ends too soon.  Surely you don’t really believe that all that holds you back from the top is clichés?  I’d say that, unlike tennis, there is a big element of luck.  What really matters is whether a million others are interested in the same things you are, enough to fork out $20 to read what you have to say.  And this is not under human control, at all. 

So, how’s that cat book comin’?

tom swick 04.05.09 | 8:49 AM ET

Patrick,
  I found a major similarity between tennis players and travel writers and thought I’d have fun seeing how far I could take it. I didn’t intend to make a statement apart from the original one: that we both do work that many people view as play. Adding the differences would have hurt the piece, I think. But you’re right - luck is a big one, as is (somewhat related) who you know. Unfortunately, possessing pure talent is often not enough in our game.
  Tom

Ling 04.05.09 | 10:09 AM ET

I’ll be happy to switch over to tennis, if they’ll pay me by the hour to hit serves into the net all day long when no one’s watching.

Rob 04.05.09 | 4:56 PM ET

Speaking of luck, here’s my favorite quote on the subject. It’s attributed to Thomas Jefferson: “I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work the more I have of it.”

Robert Reid 04.05.09 | 11:01 PM ET

Interesting idea here. Seems to me though that, unlike tennis, a writer’s monster back-spin lead paragraph never even guarantees being published, much less a win. If you serve steady aces in tennis, though, you will win!

I tend to think of travel writers more like indie rockers. Often, a wide-eyed and dreaming lot, with only the tiny tiny fortunate few ever graduating to revelance with their ageing audience in the long run. Great album covers though.

Migration Mark 04.06.09 | 9:41 AM ET

It definitely takes a lot of hard work on either side of the spectrum to gain popularity.

James C 04.06.09 | 1:05 PM ET

There are days when even a top tennis player just can’t find his or her form and crashes out to the unseeded.  Writers call this “writer’s block”?

John R 04.07.09 | 1:37 AM ET

Harsh critics might call this piece one big unforced error.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.