Moscow vs. Lonely Planet
Travel Blog • Michael Yessis • 08.10.06 | 4:08 PM ET
Politics, business and travel often intertwine. Take, for example, Lonely Planet. Recently, the guidebook giant has lobbied the United States Congress to support a National Passport Month. In 2002, Hong Kong took issue with Lonely Planet’s guidebook coverage. In 2004, Burma Campaign UK called for a boycott of the guidebook giant simply for publishing a book about the country. Now it’s Moscow’s turn to take some shots at LP. From a story by Tom Parfitt in the Guardian: “Moscow officials have launched an attack on Lonely Planet, saying the backpackers’ guide portrays the Russian capital as a gangster-infested Gotham and presents an image of the city that is at least 15 years out of date.”
The criticism, according to Parfitt, “comes as city officials launch a £14m initiative to improve Moscow’s image abroad.” Lonely Planet isn’t the only one being called out. British consultants Mercer HR are also taking heat for a recent survey that moved Moscow past Tokyo to become the world’s most expensive city.
Email to friend
Twitter
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Furl
Ma.gnolia
Mixx
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Yahoo! Buzz
Michael Yessis is the cofounder and coeditor-in-chief of World Hum.
Frank 08.10.06 | 8:46 PM ET
England had some beefs with the latest Rough Guide too, apparently objecting to being called a nation of “overweight, sex-and-celebrity-obsessed TV addicts.”
http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=605162006
Penny 08.16.06 | 4:14 PM ET
I have the Lonely Planet guide to Moscow and nothing that was quoted in the Guardian article is in the guidebook! It seems like they made up a bunch of quotes and attributed them to Lonely Planet. What gives? Just a publicity ploy to lure people to Moscow?